Permanent Epicardial Pacemaker Therapy in Paediatrics' Population in a Single Centre in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2025.15.2.1130Abstract
Background: Permanent cardiac pacing is uncommon in children, and when performed, it is typically achieved through epicardial pacing. We analysed our clinical group's experience with epicardial pacemaker implantation.
Objective: To assess our experience with epicardial pacemakers and to identify potential factors that could predict early and late lead-related complications.
Materials and Methods: This study included 34 patients under the age of 12 who underwent implantation of an epicardial pacemaker between 2018 and 2020. A retrospective review of their medical records was conducted. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the institution. A thorough review of the cardiac surgical and pacemaker databases identified all the paediatric patients who underwent permanent epicardial pacemakers implantation at a tertiary care hospital of Peshawar. Adult patients with an age of were omitted to focus on paediatric cohort. Medical records were retrospectively studied.
Results: For each patient, the average age across all PPM implantations, including any repeat procedures, was 7.2 ± 2.6 years. The average weight at the time of lead implantation was 24.8±4.0kg. The majority of patients who underwent pacemaker implantation or lead replacement surgery were discharged from the hospital within a week of the procedure. Of all the patients, 36.8% required a pacemaker due to post-op atrioventricular block, 28% had sinus node dysfunction, 20% had congenital complete heart block, and approximately 15.2% of the patients required a pacemaker for other reasons, including bradycardia caused by antiarrhythmic medication.
Conclusion: The leads exhibited commendable longevity, enduring without significant variations based on their type. Lead and generator lifespan were unaffected by lead type, pacing mode, or patient age.
Keywords: Epicardial pacemaker, Generator longevity, Lead longevity, Paediatric epicardial pacing, Single ventricle pacing.
References
Patsiou V, Haidich AB, Baroutidou A, Giannopoulos A, Giannakoulas G. Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric patients with atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Pediatric Cardiology. 2023 Dec;44(8):1641-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03213-x
Yang C, Qi J, Alam M, Zou D. Transvenous endocardial pacing with SelectSecure™ 3830 lead in pediatric patients: case series of two infants and a literature review. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03820-3
Orton EC. Epicardial pacemaker implantation in small animals. Journal of Veterinary Cardiology. 2019 Apr 1;22:65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2018.11.004
Ergul Y, Sahin GT, Kafali HC, Onan IS. Permanent pacemaker implantation with hybrid endocardial perventricular approach in infancy: May be an alternative route in the absence of epicardial lead. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2024 Feb 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14942
Al-Maisary SS, Romano G, Karck M, De Simone R. Epicardial pacemaker as a bridge for pacemaker-dependent patients undergoing explantation of infected cardiac implantable electronic devices. Journal of Cardiac Surgery: Including Mechanical and Biological Support for the Heart and Lungs. 2019 Jun;34(6):424-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14058
Phillips P, Krahn AD, Andrade JG, Chakrabarti S, Thompson CR, Harris DJ, et al. Treatment and prevention of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. CJC open. 2022 Nov 1;4(11):946-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2022.07.010
Costa R, Silva KR, Martinelli M, Carrillo R. Minimally invasive epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates with congenital heart block. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia. 2017 Sep 4;109:331-9. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170126
Kumthekar RN, Opfermann JD, Mass P, Contento JM, Berul CI. Percutaneous epicardial pacing in infants using direct visualization: A feasibility animal study. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2023 Jun;34(6):1452-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15926
Ashfaq A, Khan MA, Atiq M, Amanullah MM. Dual chamber pacemaker implants--a new opportunity in Pakistan for children with congenital and acquired complete heart block. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2011;61(4):421.
Termosesov S, Kulbachinskaya E, Polyakova E, Khaspekov D, Grishin I, Bereznitskaya V, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic pacemaker lead placement in children with atrioventricular block. Annals of pediatric cardiology. 2021 Jan 1;14(1): 67-71. https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.APC_93_20
Maully JS, Michael JS, Jennifer NAS, Seshadri B, Cheyenne MB, Monica NB. "2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients: developed in collaboration with and endorsed by the heart rhythm society (HRS), the American college of cardiology (ACC), the American heart association (AHA), and the association for European paediatric and congenital cardiology (AEPC) endorsed by the Asia pacific heart rhythm society (APHRS), the Indian heart rhythm society (IHRS), and the latin American heart" JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2021: 1437-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2021.07.009
Kumthekar RN, Howard TS. Recent Advancements in Cardiac Implantable Devices for Pediatric Patients. Current Pediatrics Reports. 2024 Oct 11: 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-024-00334-6
Karim F, Peck D, Narasimhan S, Von Bergen NH. Epicardial Implantation of a Micra™ Pacemaker in a Premature Neonate with Congenital Complete Heart Block. The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management. 2024 Jan;15(1):5739. https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2024.15012
Diksha SR, Vijay Aggarwal SG. Fetal Complete Heart Block. A Successful Surgical Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in a Small for Gestational Age Baby (2.4 Kg): A Case report and Mini Review. Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2024;7(12):2641-0419. https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/425
Ergün S, Kafal? HC, Genç SB, Yildiz O, Güne? M, Onan IS, et al. Epicardial Pacemaker in Neonates and Infants: Is There a Relationship Between Patient Size, Device Size, and Wound Complicat?on?. Pediatric cardiology. 2020 Apr; 41(4):755-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02306-1
Choi YS, Yin RT, Pfenniger A, Koo J, Avila R, Benjamin Lee K, et al. Fully implantable and bioresorbable cardiac pacemakers without leads or batteries. Nature biotechnology. 2021 Oct;39(10): 1228-38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00948-x
Konta L, Chubb MH, Bostock J, Rogers J, Rosenthal E. Twenty-seven years experience with transvenous pacemaker implantation in children weighing< 10 kg. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2016 Feb;9(2):e003422. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003422
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The authors retain the copyrights. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
