Evaluating the Perceptions and Adoption of ChatGPT in Medical Education and Clinical Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2025.15.4.1304Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly transformed healthcare, particularly in diagnostics, predictive analytics, and medical education. Recently, ChatGPT has emerged as a widely accessible AI-driven tool, gaining rapid adoption among medical students and healthcare professionals. While it offers potential benefits such as academic support and clinical assistance, concerns persist regarding over-reliance, diminished critical thinking, and accuracy of clinical recommendations.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions and adoption of ChatGPT in medical education and clinical practice across medical and dental institutions in Peshawar and Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan.
Methodology: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted between January and April 2025, recruiting 370 participants through stratified convenience sampling from 12 medical colleges and teaching hospitals. Data were collected using a validated, standardized 19-item questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.78; CVI = 0.89). Associations between demographic variables and ChatGPT adoption were assessed using chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction, and effect sizes were reported using Cramer’s V.
Results: The study revealed that early-year medical students demonstrated greater reliance on ChatGPT for academic purposes, while senior clinicians expressed caution regarding its role in clinical practice. Significant associations were found between academic year and perceptions of ChatGPT’s importance for academic success (χ²=25.31, p<0.001) and reliability (χ²=18.64, p=0.001), as well as between field of study and its use for self-diagnosis (χ²=22.47, p<0.001) and academic recommendations (χ²=19.76, p<0.001). Weak-to-moderate effect sizes were observed.
Conclusion: ChatGPT is increasingly recognized as a supplementary educational and clinical resource, particularly by early-stage students. However, its limitations in nuanced clinical judgment raise concerns about over-reliance. AI tools like ChatGPT should therefore be integrated thoughtfully into medical education, complementing rather than replacing critical thinking and professional expertise.
Keywords: Adoption, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Clinical practice, Medical education, Perceptions.
References
Tangadulrat P, Sono S, Tangtrakulwanich B. Using ChatGPT for Clinical Practice and Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Students' and Physicians' Perceptions. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e50658. https://doi.org/10.2196/50658
Gandhi AP, Joesph FK, Rajagopal V. Performance of ChatGPT on the India Undergraduate Community Medicine Examination: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Form Res. 2024;8:e49964. https://doi.org/10.2196/49964
Choudhury A, Elkefi S, Tounsi A. Exploring factors influencing user perspective of ChatGPT as a technology that assists in healthcare decision making: A cross-sectional survey study. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0296151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296151
Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
Safranek CW, Sidamon-Eristoff AE, Gilson A, Chartash D. The role of large language models in medical education: applications and implications. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e50945. https://doi.org/10.2196/50945
Wang X, Sanders HM, Liu Y. ChatGPT: promise and challenges for deployment in low-and middle-income countries. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023;41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100965
Kim HW, Shin DH, Kim J. Assessing the performance of ChatGPT responses to questions related to epilepsy: A cross-sectional study on natural language processing and medical information retrieval. Seizure. 2024;114:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2023.12.015
Examining Real-World Medication Consultations and Drug-Herb Interactions: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e48433. doi:10.2196/48433. https://doi.org/10.2196/48433
Heston TF, Khun C. Natural language processing in medicine: a review. Trends Med. 2021;21(3):123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trendsmed.2021.03.005
Sallam M, Salim NA, Barakat M. Assessing health students' attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: validation study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9(1):e48254. https://doi.org/10.2196/48254
Khan RA, Jawaid M. ChatGPT and medical education: a double-edged sword. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(2):387-389. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.23-15
Wartman SA, Combs CD. Medical education must move from the information age to the age of artificial intelligence. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1107-1109. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002044.
Longhurst GJ, Stone DM, Dulohery K, Scully D, Campbell T, Smith CF. ChatGPT in medical education: a paradigm shift or a passing trend? Medical Teacher. 2023;45(3):327–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2186364
Adnan Abu Hammour. Over-reliance on AI in Medical Education: Risks and Mitigation Strategies. Med Teach. 2023;41(5):567-575.
Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present, and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):230-243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101.
Masters K. Artificial intelligence in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(9):976-980. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1595557
Smith L. Ethical Implications of AI in Healthcare: A Framework for Safe Implementation. J Med Ethics. 2023;15(4):112-125. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2023-109456
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542(7639):115-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056.
Wahl B, Cossy-Gantner A, Germann S, Schwalbe NR. Artificial intelligence (AI) and global health: how can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings? BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(4):e000798. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000798
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The authors retain the copyrights. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
