Age-Related Variations in Common Bile Duct Diameter: Implications for Diagnostic Accuracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2025.15.3.1007Abstract
Background: Dilation of the common bile duct (CBD) is a frequently observed phenomenon, particularly in the aging population. Several clinical conditions, including choledocholithiasis, strictures, tumors, previous surgeries, and periampullary diverticula, may contribute to CBD enlargement. However, age-related physiological changes may also cause gradual dilation, potentially confounding diagnostic interpretations.
Objective: This study aims to assess the variation in CBD diameter among different age groups, in order to establish age-specific reference values and avoid misdiagnosis.
Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital, Swat. Data collection spanned from March 22, 2022, to June 30, 2022. All patients undergoing ultrasonography who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. CBD diameter was measured using high-resolution ultrasonography.
Results: The mean CBD diameter across all patients was 5.3 ± 1.4 mm. Age-stratified analysis revealed progressive enlargement with age: 4.5 mm in patients <30 years, 4.8 mm in those aged 31–40 years, 5.2 mm in the 41–50 years group, 5.4 mm in the 51–60 years group, and 6.6 mm in patients aged ≥61 years. The differences in mean CBD diameter across age groups were statistically significant (p-value = 0.001).
Conclusion: The study found a significant age-related increase in CBD diameter. Recognizing this physiological expansion is essential to avoid over-diagnosis of pathological conditions. Age-specific normal ranges for CBD diameter should be considered in clinical practice to improve diagnostic accuracy, especially in elderly patients.
Keywords: Aging, CBD Diameter, Common Bile Duct, Dilation, Diagnostic Accuracy, Ultrasonography.
References
Park CY, Choi SH, Kwon CI, Cho JH, Jang SI, Lee TH, et al. What is the better surgical treatment option for recurrent common bile duct stones?. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research. 2020 Dec 1;99(6):329-36. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.6.329
Barakat MM, Rarman MA. Transabdominal SonographicAssessment of the Mean and Upper Limit Diameter of the Non-Obstructed Common Bile Duct in Different Age Groups and Post Cholecystectomy for Early Prediction of Biliary Obstruction. The Medical Journal of Cairo University. 2022 Sep 1;90(9):1469-77. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2022.264602
Pallaneeandee NK, Govindan SS, Jun LZ. Evaluation of the Common bile duct (CBD) Diameter After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Retrospective Study. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2023 Feb 1;33(1):62-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001135
Lal N, Mehra S, Lal V. Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2014 Dec;8(12):AC01. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8738.5232
Govindan S, Tamrat NE, Liu ZJ. Effect of ageing on the common bile duct diameter. Dig Surg. 2021;38:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519446
Sperna Weiland CJ. Suspected common bile duct stones: reduction of unnecessary ERCP by pre-procedural imaging and timing of ERCP. Surgical Endoscopy. 2023 Feb;37(2):1194-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09615-x
Phan J, Ge PS. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluating patients with bile duct dilation of unclear etiology. Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2021 Oct;22(10):597-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.13046
Beyer G. Definition of age-dependent reference values for the diameter of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct on MRCP: a population-based, cross-sectional cohort study. Gut. 2023 Sep 1;72(9):1738-44. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326106
Pallaneeandee NK, Govindan SS, Jun LZ. Evaluation of the common bile duct (CBD) diameter after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE): a retrospective study. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2023 Feb 1;33(1):62-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001135
Lee S, Kim MJ, Kim S, Choi D, Jang KT, Park YN. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: assessment of invasive carcinoma and long-term outcomes using MRI. Journal of Hepatology. 2019 Apr 1;70(4):692-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.005
Han Q, Li H, Jia M, Wang L, Zhao Y, Zhang M, et al. Age?related changes in metabolites in young donor livers and old recipient sera after liver transplantation from young to old rats. Aging Cell. 2021 Jul;20(7):e13425. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13425
Babinski MA, Pires LA. Anatomy and Embryology of the Intra-and Extrahepatic Biliary Tract. InGallbladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Guide to Management. 2025 Jan 26 (pp. 15-24). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76746-3_2
Valkovic P, Miletic D, Zelic M, Brkljacic B. Dynamic changes in the common bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective longitudinal sonographic study. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound. 2011 Oct;32(05):479-84. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1273224
Park JS, Lee DH, Jeong S, Cho SG. Determination of diameter and angulation of the normal common bile duct using multidetector computed tomography. Gut and Liver. 2009 Dec 31;3(4):306. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2009.3.4.306
Admassie D. Ultrasound assessment of common bile duct diameter in Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Medical Journal. 2008 Oct 1;46(4):391-5.
Hegyi P, Maléth J, Walters JR, Hofmann AF, Keely SJ. Guts and gall: bile acids in regulation of intestinal epithelial function in health and disease. Physiological reviews. 2018 Oct 1;98(4):1983-2023. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00054.2017
Benjaminov F, Leichtman G, Naftali T, Half EE, Konikoff FM. Effects of age and cholecystectomy on common bile duct diameter as measured by endoscopic ultrasonography. Surgical endoscopy. 2013 Jan;27:303-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2445-7
Bruno M. Unexplained common bile duct dilatation with normal serum liver enzymes: diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound and follow-up of this condition. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2014 Sep 1;48(8):e67-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a8848a
Lal N, Mehra S, Lal V. Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2014 Dec 5;8(12):AC01. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8738.5232
Hernanz-Schulman M, Ambrosino MM, Freeman PC, Quinn CB. Common bile duct in children: sonographic dimensions. Radiology. 1995 Apr;195(1):193-5. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892467
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The authors retain the copyrights. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purpose. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
